jump to navigation

Global Peace- Pax Terrae May 2, 2009

Posted by earthking in Conservatives, Liberals, Life, Politics.
3 comments

I was watching Meet the Press about a month ago when a three politicians, including Arnold Schwarzenegger, were on talking about the need to update our country’s infrastructure.  Arnold spoke about a very big idea- there is no reason why we have traffic jams in this day and age.  It is an ambitious problem to tackle, and he wants to address it.  However, I was driving home from work today and thought of another big idea- Pax Terrae- for a period of 30, 40, maybe evern 100 years. 

Imagine if world leaders agreed to stop ALL conflicts for a period of time, and dedicate resources that are now destroying people or plan on destroying, and spend that money on fixing problems like AIDS, hunger, drought, etc.  I remember hearing about the Pax Romana while in high school, how the Romans had a period of relative peace for about 200 years.  I learned that the resources were spent on the interior of the Roman empire and helped to foster a period of prosperity.  We should do this today, but on a global basis. 

Some might argue that it is too ideological to wish for such a thing.  It may be difficult, but why can’t people around the world push their leaders to do something like this.  After all, many individuals feel as if war is simply caused by a few big egos unwilling to sit down and talk through their problems.  Their egos end up shedding blood and innocent lives are permanently affected by death, loss of limbs, or homelessness. 

Another issue would be dealing with aggressors, such as those who took down the World Trade Centers in 9/11.  Yes, some individuals and world leaders would not want to comply, but if enough countries are on board, then pressure would be mounted against those who did not want to comply.  War would have to be avoided at all costs. 

To ensure some kind of compliance with the Pax Terrae, world leaders would have to sign some kind of  a pact or treaty with the world.  This could flow through the UN or some other kind of coalition, but it would have to start at the grass roots level.  Individual people would have to put pressure on politicians to fight for this.  After all, who wants war? 

Let me know your thoughts.

Advertisements

Orphans and Gays Adopting December 4, 2008

Posted by earthking in Conservatives, Liberals, Life, Philosophy, Politics.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

A few days ago I was listening to a talk radio show while driving.  The topic of the debate was whether or not gays should be able to adopt children.  By no means am I one claiming it is an easy issue to resolve as we do not live in a perfect world and there are many children who are in need of a home.  I have known a few gay couples who have successfully adopted children and they will most likely raise responsible citizens. 

However, in a world with about 1 billion Christians, I don’t think there should be any orphans at all.  In fact, the Bible is very clear about the mandate for Christians (and Jews) to take care of the widows and orphans.  I understand that not every Christian can financially take on another child.  But there are many that could easily take in an orphan or two.  If even half of Christians could take in an orphan, I bet there wouldn’t be such a problem in this world.  If there weren’t such a problem, then perhaps the entire debate about gays adopting children wouldn’t exist. 

Moreover, Christians believe that the soul is of more importance than the body.  So, when analyzing the debate about gays adopting children, this must be in the mind of Christians.  I have no doubt that the gays who live in a stable relationship can provide a better home than many straight couples.  I have known several very hard working gay couples who are very kind and great citizens of the United Staes.  When it comes to providing materially for children, many gay couples can do a fantastic job.  However, what good would it be for the child to gain the world, but lose his soul?

Be Progressive September 19, 2007

Posted by earthking in Conservatives, Liberals, Life, Philosophy, Politics.
add a comment

Many liberals try to propose these new “progressive” ideas as something that is really new.  In fact, when you look at one of their main arguments against traditional values, you will find that they are opposed to being “close-minded.”  One of my family members who is in a homosexual lifestyle constantly tells me how he is uncomfortable with traditional forms of religion because they tend to be close-minded and make everything out to be so black and white.  He was a member of a Unitarian Universalist church for a few years before dropping out.  Yet, these liberals fail to look into the history of ideas.  Homosexuality has been around for millenia and the same with abortion.  The entire idea of breaking free of traditional religious beliefs is also found in the ancient Greek culture, too.  Look at the dialogues of Plato and you will find that very easily.  The notion that there is no moral truth is not a new idea either; many philosophers thought the very same thing, and I’m not talking about modern philosophers only.  My point is that the “progressive” ideas are actually very old; there has always been a battle of ideas.  However, can one really find truth without also having a good will- one that constantly seeks the good?  I will touch on this in the next blog. 

Main political differences: am I wrong? September 18, 2007

Posted by earthking in Conservatives, Liberals, Philosophy, Politics.
add a comment

My family was not very political when I was growing up, so I am sort of new to the whole politics thing.  But, it seems to me that the Republicans and Democrats fundamentally are different when it comes to solving problems.  Please correct me if I’m wrong so I can learn. 

 The Republicans nowadays stress free enterprise and less government to solve problems.  They see the free markets as solving most problems since supply will meet demand.  If people want better cars, then the car companies will have to make better cars or else their sales will drop.  If people want healthcare, then the government needs to step away from the game and let the markets provide better medicine.  If the markets provide better medicine, people will buy it.  Essentially, everything is driven by money when it comes to Republicans…or so it seems.

 Democrats, on the other hand, seem to view big corporations and the free market as stomping out the rights of the people.  Government needs to protect people from the greedy corporations who just want to make tons of money without respite.  The view it as the job of government to protect especially those who are most vulnerable, since the wealthy can pretty much take care of themselves.  Just look into history and you will see what happens to workers if their rights are not protected. 

Is this a fair view of both parties…in a nutshell? 

Universal Healthcare September 15, 2007

Posted by earthking in Conservatives, Liberals, Life, Politics.
add a comment

The whole idea of universal healthcare in this country is becoming a very popular topic.  My dad likes the idea, however, I am still deciding.  If you go to wikipedia and look up “universal healthcare”, they have a pretty good expose on the different arguments for and against it, as well as links to websites with further arguments.  The people who are fighting for it have some pretty good arguments.  I do believe people have a right to healthcare, but I don’t think this necessarily implies that the government must supply the care.  We all have the right to eat, but the government doesn’t supply us all with food.  We have the right to raise a family, but the government doesn’t arrange marriages.  So, I think the idea that people do NOT have the right to healthcare under the US Constitution is a buch of bullshit.  Taking care of your health is a basic human right.  But, I cringe at the idea of the government controlling our healthcare simply because they screw up most of their undertakings.  At the end of the day, I am leaning towards the idea that people need to take responsibility for taking care of themselves and not lean on the government.  We have Medicaid for those who are in dire needs of help.  Please comment, I am still open-minded on this topic.

Stats R Us September 14, 2007

Posted by earthking in Conservatives, Liberals, Life, Philosophy, Politics, Religion.
add a comment

Everywhere we turn we find people in the media quoting statistics to support their viewpoint.  The problem is that we don’t even know if those stats are correct.  Take the latest polls on the presidential campaigns.  All that those say is that out of the people who responded to a request for their opinion, here is who is winning or losing.  Or, is it possible that the media distorts the polls to get people to think that their candidate of choice is a loser, so they should just vote for the one who will probably win?  How about the stats of uninsured Americans- I was never asked whether or not I was insured.  I don’t even know anybody who knew somebody who was asked.  Do you?  Certainly not all insured Americans have coverage through employer-sponsored plans, so the stats couldn’t have come from all employers.  Watch what information you believe.  And watch who uses information to promote a cause when the quoted stats could be wrong.  This rule goes for anything coming from any side of the political spectrum. 

MEN TO WOMEN- THE PERVERSION OF MANHOOD September 13, 2007

Posted by earthking in Life, Philosophy, Politics, Religion.
2 comments

Today I talked with the liberal queen in my office who said that the concept of a lifetime commitment in marriage is wrong- it just creates frustration for people and that probably wasn’t the way it was meant to be.  This is a complete perversion of what it means to be a man.  Doing what is right as opposed to what you want to do is the true measure of a man.  The aversion of man’s loyalty to commitment brings him to the level of a beast or animal.  Marriage, and for that matter, all commitment, takes work.  There will be times when men will want to throw in the towel.  But for the man who thinks of wavering from the path of commitment due to temptation must rise to the test to prove his commitment.  Our culture is perverse and what appears to be mainstream is demeaning to real manhood.  BEWARE OF WIMPS!

Open-Mindedness and Bi-Partisanship September 12, 2007

Posted by earthking in Life, Philosophy, Politics, Religion.
add a comment

I have a bachelor’s degree in philosophy, and I studied some of the greates minds of all time:  Plato, Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, Bacon, DesCartes, Kant, and others.  One thing that I noticed about the truly great minds, those who were bent on finding and living out the truth about themselves and the universe, is that they not only knew about ideas they personally held, but studied ideas of people they thought were wrong.  Even more interesting, St. Thomas Aquinas could think of better objections to his arguments than his adversaries.  He debated quite frequently and wrote many treatises, and you always find it puzzling how he unravelled ideas that seemed insurmountable. 

 Currently our country is undergoing major rifts on different issues.  I honestly believe that people need to be much more open-minded.  Why?  Because these rifts will never mend until people begin to discuss ideas.  There can be no discussion if there is no willingness to listen.  This does not mean that the other side must be accepted, but at least understand what the other side is about.  

 My father is very liberal, which sometimes makes it difficult for me to visit him.  However, I have found that some of his ideas are actually good.  Yes!  I find some liberal ideas good!  I have learned over the years that no political group has a monopoly on good ideas.  Wouldn’t you agree?  And I also find that more often than not, I can even learn about people through bad ideas.  For example, communism arose primarily because the working class was oppressed.  Whether or not you believe in communism, you can learn from history.  Anybody who is oppressed, or any group that does not feel like it is heard, is vulnerable.  That group feels like there are very few solutions for their situation, so when someone comes along with a BIG solution, they grab onto it. 

 My point is this:  be open-minded, and learn from everybody.  Do not accept all ideas, yet, be open to what others have to say.  Adios for now.